How an oil and gas operator proved turbine degradation is detectable when the data alone was not enough

Engineering expertise converted into mathematics: degradation indicators derived from first principles, then validated on 15 years of sensor history.

2validated degradation indicators
42 + 142historian and PLC tags analysed
1 monthto a go / no-go answer

The challenge

An upstream oil and gas operator runs gas-turbine-driven compressors to re-pressurise gas at a production field. Financial and production planning needed degradation monitoring and remaining-lifetime estimation, but nobody knew whether the historical sensor data contained enough information to detect and model degradation. Unplanned failure of these assets carries capital-scale maintenance consequences.

At a glance

DataPI historian (42 tags, 2007–2014), PLC (142 tags, 2004–2009)

MethodsARIMA, piecewise OLS trend fitting, indicator derivation

PartnerUniversity fluid-mechanics department

What we did

Instead of waiting for a richer dataset, SWICON worked with a university fluid-mechanics department to convert non-quantifiable engineering expertise into mathematical form. Thermodynamic degradation indicators (polytropic exponent, pressure ratio, efficiency) were derived from first principles and computed from historian and PLC time series spanning 2004–2014. Trends were fitted piecewise, segmented by maintenance events, to separate recoverable degradation (washing cycles) from non-recoverable long-term wear.

The result

The proof of concept confirmed that turbine degradation is detectable from the available sensor data. Two degradation indicators, a power indicator and a temperature indicator, were derived and validated, showing both recoverable and non-recoverable degradation in the time series. The client got a green light for the full degradation modelling project. This is the reusable answer to the objection that the data is not good enough for AI.

Facing something similar? Let’s talk.

Contact us